FDA cites bleeding risk with experimental J&J drug

0 comments

Posted on 17th March 2009 by Gordon Johnson in Uncategorized

, , , , , , ,

Date: 3/17/2009

By MATTHEW PERRONE
AP Business Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal health officials say a Johnson & Johnson drug helps prevent deadly blood clots in patients getting hip or knee replacement, but it also carries a risk of serious internal bleeding.

Johnson & Johnson and partner Bayer have asked the Food and Drug Administration to approve their once-daily pill, rivaroxaban, as an anticlotting drug to stop blood clots in legs and those that can travel to the lungs. More than 800,000 U.S. patients receive hip or knee replacements each year, and an estimated 40 to 60 percent are at risk of blood clots.

But FDA regulators said in documents posted online Tuesday that the drug carries nearly twice the risk of bleeding of Sanofi-Aventis’ Lovenox, the top-selling blood thinner used by patients receiving orthopedic implants.

On Thursday the agency will ask a panel of cardiology experts to weigh in on the drug’s risks and benefits. The FDA is not required to follow the advice of its panel, though it usually does.

After reviewing four studies with more than 12,000 patients, the FDA said major bleeding occurred in 0.4 percent of patients on the J&J; drug, compared with 0.2 percent of those taking Sanofi’s drug, known chemically as enoxaparin. The drug was Paris-based Sanofi’s biggest product last year, with sales of $3.5 billion.

“The evidence that administration of rivaroxaban could lead to bleeding events in significantly more patients relative to enoxaparin amplifies this safety concern,” states the FDA’s review, posted online Tuesday.

Regulators also voiced concerns about potential risks of liver injury or toxicity, a common side effect with blood-thinning drugs. Bayer and J&J; have proposed that the drug would be used for only two weeks by knee surgery patients and five weeks by hip surgery patients.

But the FDA is concerned doctors could use it for longer periods. The agency will ask its panelists whether there is enough information to gauge the risks of the drug over the long term.

The agency said it asked the companies to develop a lower-dose version of rivaroxaban that could be used by patients with liver or kidney problems. According to the agency, the companies “regarded this modification as unnecessary.”

But a J&J; spokesman said the company “is actively working with the FDA on this issue to assure the best balance of benefit and risk.”

The FDA also said the companies declined to design a risk minimization strategy for their drug, or a plan to help doctors and patients use the drug safely. But the company said it has submitted a number of plans to reduce the drug’s risks, including education and outreach programs.

The agency will have to weigh rivaroxaban’s risks against its promise as a lifesaving medication.

In four studies of knee and hip replacement patients, rivaroxaban cut the risk of blood clots or death in half, to 0.6 percent, compared with 1.3 percent for patients taking Lovenox.

Rivaroxaban is one of several new anticlotting drugs designed to be safer and more effective than older treatments. One mainstay of anticlotting treatment, Coumadin or warfarin, requires patients to undergo frequent blood tests because a too-high or too-low dose can lead to strokes or dangerous bleeding.

“If we look at our program, we believe we have a very effective drug with a very positive benefit risk profile,” J&J; Vice President Peter Wildgoose said in an interview last week.

J&J; is studying the drug in more than 60,000 patients for additional uses, including stroke prevention and treatment of coronary artery disease.

If the drug is approved, Johnson & Johnson’s Ortho-McNeil business will sell the drug in U.S., while Bayer HealthCare AG will have marketing rights in other countries.

Shares of New Brunswick, N.J.-based J&J; fell $1.18, or 2.3 percent, to $49.56 in morning trading.

Copyright 2009 The Associated Press.

Jury awards nearly $16.6M in Ill. skin patch case

0 comments

Posted on 17th November 2008 by Gordon Johnson in Uncategorized

, , , , , , ,

Date: 11/18/2008

By MEGAN REICHGOTT
Associated Press Writer

CHICAGO (AP) _ Two Johnson & Johnson subsidiaries that make and distribute a painkilling skin patch must pay nearly $16.6 million to the family of a suburban woman who died from a drug overdose while using the product, a jury ruled Monday.

Janice DiCosolo, 38, of Cicero died on Feb. 15, 2004, while using a Duragesic patch that her doctor prescribed to reduce pain caused by a neurological condition called reflex sympathetic dystrophy, her attorneys said.

The mother of three died because the patch delivered a fatal dose of its main ingredient, the powerful narcotic pain reliever fentanyl, jurors ruled Monday in Cook County Circuit Court following a three-week trial.

The defendants, Titusville, N.J.-based Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc. and Mountain View, Calif.-based ALZA Corp., knew about problems with the Duragesic patch that allowed it to leak fentanyl in doses large enough to kill patients, the lawsuit claimed. Both companies are subsidiaries of New Brunswick, N.J.-based Johnson & Johnson.

“They knew this patch was dangerous and defective but they continued to sell it and make money, and that’s the only reason Janice DiCosolo is dead,” Jim Orr, an attorney for DiCosolo’s family, said in a statement.

Greg Panico, a spokesman for Janssen and ALZA, said Monday that the companies sympathize with DiCosolo’s family but disagree with the jury’s verdict.

The companies are considering options for an appeal, Panico said in a statement.

“This is a very unfortunate case for everyone, but we maintain that the patch was not defective,” he said.

An independent expert and company expert inspected the patch that DiCosolo used and concluded there was no defect, Panico said. The companies believe DiCosolo’s cause of death was polypharmacy, “a mix of multiple and potentially incompatible medications,” he said.

Duragesic is a prescription-only product that is intended for cancer patients and others with chronic pain and is designed to dispense the medicine slowly through the skin.

The verdict is the fourth trial loss for the companies since 2006, DiCosolo’s attorneys said.

A Sanford, Fla., jury last month awarded $13.3 million to the family of Susan Hodgemire, 34, who died after undergoing back surgery and using the Duragesic patch. In June 2007 a federal jury awarded $5.5 million to the father of a 28-year-old man who died in 2003 while wearing the patch.

The Food and Drug Administration issued two warnings in two years about improper use of fentanyl patches.

Some of the deaths came after doctors prescribed the patches to the wrong patients, the FDA said in December 2007. Patients could also accidentally overdose by using the patches wrong, the FDA said.

Some patches containing fentanyl were recalled in February 2008 because of a flaw that could cause them to leak. Those patches were sold in the United States by Actavis South Atlantic LLC and had both that name and the company’s former name, Abrika Pharmaceuticals Inc., on the packaging.

Also in February, PriCara, another Johnson & Johnson division announced a recall of fentanyl patches manufactured by ALZA Corp.

The patches were first approved under the brand name Duragesic in 1990. A generic version hit the market in 2005.

Copyright 2008 The Associated Press.
Summary