Melamine already in global food chain: experts say

0 comments

Posted on 31st October 2008 by Gordon Johnson in Uncategorized

, , , , , ,

Date: 10/31/2008

By GILLIAN WONG
Associated Press Writer

BEIJING (AP) _ First it was baby milk formula. Then, dairy-based products from yogurt to chocolate.

Now chicken eggs have been contaminated with melamine, and an admission by state-run media that the industrial chemical is regularly added to animal feed in China is fueling fears the problem could be more widespread, affecting fish, meat and who knows what else.

Peter Dingle, a toxicity expert at Murdoch University in Perth, Australia, said, however, that aside from the tainted baby formula that killed at least four Chinese infants and left 54,000 children hospitalized just over a month ago, it is unlikely humans will get sick from melamine.

The amount of the chemical in a few servings of bacon, for instance, would simply be too low, he said.

But Dingle and others said China should have cracked down sooner on feed companies that have boosted their earnings by fortifying their products with the chemical, which is normally used in the manufacture of plastic and fertilizers.

Rich in nitrogen, melamine gives low-quality food and feed artificially high protein readings.

“Traders can make a lot of profit by doing it,” said Jason Yan, the U.S. Grains Council’s technical director in Beijing.

Extremely high levels of melamine — as found in the Chinese baby formula — can cause kidney stones, and in extreme cases can bring on life-threatening kidney failure.

But while scientists say it’s not dangerous to ingest small amounts, they cannot be definitive because there have been no tests on melamine’s effects in humans. Until the contaminated baby formula became public in September, there was never any reason to.

That leaves consumers worldwide, particularly parents, worried about food products from China, and even those made elsewhere with ingredients imported from Chinese companies.

Among those not taking any chances is Pranee Suankaew, a homemaker in Bangkok, Thailand.

“Let’s go, let’s go,” the 37-year-old mother said as she tugged her 4-year-old away from the candy aisle where he eagerly eyed a bag of M&Ms.; “We’re getting you fruit and a lollipop. There’s no milk in that.”

She said she usually gives in to avoid tantrums. “But this time, I told him, no, no, no.”

Experts say melamine sometimes accidentally leaches into the food supply in low levels, from things like plastic dinnerware. It can also seep in from some pesticides and fertilizers.

But in China it’s become clear that the chemical is deliberately added.

The baby formula set off a global recall of foods made with Chinese dairy products and sparked raids in supermarkets across Asia. Twelve truckloads of candy, yogurt and other dairy-based goods were burned in Indonesia’s capital, Jakarta, just this week.

In light of Wednesday reports by state media on the widespread use of the chemical in animal feed, health experts say the government clearly knew melamine was being added for more than a year, since contaminated dog food made it to markets in North America, but didn’t crack down on producers as promised.

With the scandal escalating, Chinese leaders are now desperate to clean up the country’s image, making dozens of arrests in recent weeks and firing local and even high-level officials for negligence.

John Chapple, a Singapore-based adviser to Sinoanalytica, a food analysis laboratory in the Chinese city of Qingdao, said the decision to allow state media to report on the years of melamine use seems to show the government is ready to be more active in dealing with food safety.

“However, one is not going to change a hierarchical government system overnight,” he added. “It is usually going to be slow to start to react to a crisis, but quick to finally nail it.”

Though China has vowed to boost inspections for melamine contamination, it will be difficult to monitor the countless small, illegally operating manufacturers found across the country, other experts said.

“It could take five or even 10 years” before some companies stop adding the chemical to food products, said Yan, of the U.S. Grains Council.

___

Associated Press writer Robin McDowell in Jakarta, Indonesia, contributed to this report.

Copyright 2008 The Associated Press.

AstraZeneca 3Q profits up 29 percent

0 comments

Posted on 30th October 2008 by Gordon Johnson in Uncategorized

, , , , , , , ,

10/30/2008

By JANE WARDELL
AP Business Writer

LONDON (AP) _ Pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca PLC posted a 29 percent rise in third quarter net profit on Thursday as strong sales in emerging markets like China helped offset flat demand for its products in the United States.

London-based AstraZeneca also lifted its full-year earnings forecast as it banked on the pharmaceutical industry being more resilient than other businesses to the global economic downturn — adding that it is on the lookout for acquisitions arising from the crisis.

Net profit was up to $1.73 billion in three months ended Sept. 30, from $1.34 billion in the same quarter a year ago.

Revenue rose 9 percent to $7.78 billion over the quarter, from $7.15 billion, despite what chief executive officer David Brennan termed an “increasingly challenging environment.”

Chief financial officer Simon Lowth said AstraZeneca had so far seen no impact on its business from the global financial turmoil.

“The pharmaceutical sector, we believe, will be more resilient to the downturn than other sectors,” Lowth told reporters on a conference call.

The company raised its full-year earnings per share target to between $4.90 and $5.05, citing improved gross margin and lower expenditures in research & development arising from efficiency improvements. It had previously forecast EPS of between $4.60 and $4.90 when it released its second quarter earnings in July.

The company said the new guidance is based on its original assumptions for currency values, which were average exchange rates during the fourth quarter 2007.

The company’s stock rose 5.2 percent to 2,550 pence ($41.08).

Lowth said the company had decided not to make further share repurchases this year — after total repurchases so far worth $603 million — to reserve firepower for potential acquisitions.

“We want to be ready if the flow of products … to bring into our pipeline and to market increases,” he said.

Lowth said the company was looking to acquire new compounds via product licensing and acquisitions, with a focus on core therapeutic areas.

He added that the company was in a good position to take advantage of opportunities, with its cash flow boosted to $5.95 billion in the nine months to Sept. 30, compared with $4.51 billion in 2007.

Outstanding debt, including loans, short-term borrowing and overdrafts, were at $13.37 billion at Sept. 30, of which $2.55 billion is due within one year. Lowth said the company would be able to pay that debt from its current cash balances and business cash flows, without the need to refinance.

He declined to elaborate on the size of a potential acquisition but said that AstraZeneca was committed to maintaining its credit ratings of AA-/A1.

Over the quarter, sales in the United States, where the company is facing tough generic competition to its products were unchanged as a $141 million decline in sales of Toprol-XL overshadowed 5 percent growth in the rest of the U.S. business. Lowth declined to make a prediction for U.S. sales in 2009.

Sales in the “Rest of the World” were up 6 percent, with a rise of 2 percent in established markets outshone by an 18 percent jump in emerging market sales. Sales in China alone soared 35 percent.

In terms of products, cholesterol drug Crestor was the top performer for the quarter, with sales worldwide up 28 percent to $922 million. U.S. sales of the drug were up 23 percent, fueled by its artherosclerosis label — the U.S. Food and Drug Association in November approved Crestor for a new use against an artery disease that can lead to heart attack and stroke.

Overall sales of Nexium, its heartburn drug, dropped 2 percent to $1.32 billion, while sales of Seroquel, its anti-psychotic drug, were up 4 percent at $1.13 billion.

AstraZeneca has had key wins this year against generic competition for both drugs. In April, it settled a patent lawsuit against Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd., agreeing a deal that will delay the Indian company’s release of a generic version of Nexium. In July, a decision by a U.S. court to award a summary judgment in AstraZeneca’s favor avoided the need for a full trial and meant that generic copies of Seroquel will not be launched any time soon.

Among the company’s other top drugs, sales of asthma treatment Symbicort jumped 25 percent to $501 million, while sales of breast cancer treatment Arimidex rose 9 percent to $486 million.

Copyright 2008 The Associated Press.

Amputee awaits high court, wants musical glow back

0 comments

Posted on 30th October 2008 by Gordon Johnson in Uncategorized

, , , , , , , , ,

Date: 10/30/2008

By DAVE GRAM
Associated Press Writer

MARSHFIELD, Vt. (AP) _ When Diana Levine turned 63 recently, her daughter made her a birthday card, drawing on Greek mythology with an illustration of Diana the Huntress, her bow string drawn taut, an arrow ready to fly.

But the arm pulling at the bowstring was amputated below the elbow — just like Diana Levine’s — and the target was labeled the “Wyeth monster.”

That’s Wyeth as in Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, the company Levine blames for a botched injection of the Wyeth-made drug Phenergan that led doctors to amputate her right arm in 2000.

Levine, once a professional guitar player and pianist, now plays with one hand and sings. “It’s about getting my glow back,” she said recently as she was awaiting a hearing Monday before the U.S. Supreme Court, where Wyeth is appealing a $6.7 million verdict in her favor.

The outcome of Levine’s case could have major ramifications for drug makers and consumers. The court is expected to decide whether people can sue under state law — or are pre-empted from doing so — for harm caused by a drug approved by the federal Food and Drug Administration.

Levine said the drug makers “are using my case … to get through this doctrine that will say that if it is FDA-approved, then we are not accountable, because FDA said it’s OK. … Mr. Pharmaceutical Company is not responsible and is not liable and doesn’t have to help the person who just lost her arm, or her life.”

Levine, who suffered from migraine headaches, had a particularly bad episode in the spring of 2000. A friend drove her from her dirt road farmhouse-turned-music studio in Marshfield, Vt. to a clinic in neighboring Plainfield.

She was given drugs for the pain and, to combat nausea, an intramuscular injection of Phenergan, a drug that has been around for 50 years.

When Levine complained that she still felt nauseous, the clinic suggested an “IV-push” of Phenergan. This delivered a high volume of the drug very quickly to her right arm, not the slow flow that could have been delivered by an IV drip.

The second injection accidentally punctured an artery, prompting gangrene to set in. After several weeks of deterioration, her arm was amputated.

Levine recalls first seeing what remained of her arm after surgery. “I was horrified and shocked and about as sad as I ever have been in my life,” she said.

She reached an out-of-court settlement with the clinic and sued Wyeth, contending that the label on the Phenergan she was given should have more clearly warned about the danger of giving the drug IV-push.

Combatting an upset stomach with a method that can end up causing limb loss is “an unfathomable benefit-risk ratio,” Levine said. With two other methods for injecting Phenergan, “there’s no earthly reason for this third option (IV-push) to even be made available,” she said.

Wyeth and the FDA say that when a drug like Phenergan has a federally approved label, its manufacturer is immune from lawsuits in state court. Wyeth maintains its label clearly describes the risks of Phenergan, and that it was not only approved but mandated by the FDA. “Wyeth could not change Phenergan’s labeling to comply with Vermont law without violating federal law,” it said in court papers.

Consumer groups are mounting a vigorous campaign against that position, saying federal regulation should represent the floor, not the ceiling, of a drug company’s responsibility.

“What a trial lawyer reasonably could fear in this case is that in one fell swoop, the U.S. Supreme Court would eliminate the right of an injured person to recover from a drug company in the case of a dangerous drug that caused their injury,” said Fordham University law professor Benjamin Zipursky, a product liability expert.

The court could effectively “eliminate all pharmaceutical company liability in this one case,” Zipursky said.

Bert Rein, a lawyer for Wyeth, said that concern was overblown. “Some of the hysteria being whipped up is really unjustified,” he said. “We believe the court will rule on the specific facts of the case,” rather than so broadly as to affect most liability claims.

That was not what Wyeth argued when urging the Supreme Court to take the case.

In its appeal to the court, Wyeth said the justices should act to prevent erroneous rulings in “tens of thousands of individual claims and potentially millions of class action claims” that are pending in state and federal courts.

While the legal war continues, Levine wages a more personal struggle. Sometimes it’s just to roll her left sleeve up or down, file papers, wash dishes or mow the lawn.

“If you were to put your hand in your pocket for a day and not use it, you would pretty much come to the conclusion that there’s nothing that’s a one-handed activity,” she said.

Mostly, the struggle is to continue a life in which songwriting was her gift and the guitar and piano were the tools of her trade.

“My identity was seriously damaged. Not just the musical one, but the physical. I mean, I had lost my glow, the glow was gone,” Levine said, recalling her recent performance with a group of women singers. “That’s what it’s about, it’s about getting my glow back.”

Levine has had more than a little help from her friends.

“She’s determined not to let this setback destroy her music,” said singer-songwriter Jon Gailmor, who had collaborated with Levine and her late husband in performances and on recordings. “It’s probably given her some new material, made her stronger even. She’s an amazing person.”

Quoting a musician friend, Levine calls the right hand the “joyous hand” — the one that gets to strum or pick the guitar, finding the rhythm, while the left searches the neck for the right note or chord. On keyboards, the right hand most often finds the improvisational riffs while the left lays down the underlying rhythm and chord changes.

Levine has no joyous hand now.

A piano and guitar player since childhood, she studied chemistry and psychology at the University of Vermont. Levine, who performed under the name Diana Winn, married a blues guitarist David “Crow” Levine, playing bass alongside of him in the Re-Bops, a band that gained a regional following in the 1980s.

Her husband died in 1993, leaving Levine and the couple’s daughter, Jessamine, now 25.

Now, she’s less concerned with the legal arguments than with making music and sharing it, especially with children.

She pays the bills using her monthly disability check from Social Security, Re-Bob Records sales — though she says she’s unable to keep up the business as well as she used to — and assistance from her family. “I have help from home. Nobody’s going to let me be out in the cold.”

Levine sat one recent afternoon at her
piano, accompanied by Jessamine on guitar, working out a new tune she hoped to send to actor Dennis Quaid, who is waging a drug labeling fight of his own after his infant twins were given a dose of the blood-thinnerHeparin — 1,000 times what was called for.

The twins’ birthday is in November, and Levine was writing a song for them.

Plunking out chords with her left hand, Levine asked Jessamine, “What do we go to there? Do you like G? Or should it be D-minor?”

And then she sang a song fragment:

“It’s the twinses’ birthday, celebrate times two. It’s the twinses’ birthday, if you only knew. There’s been some hard times they’ve both been through …”

Copyright 2008 The Associated Press.

Consumer group asks government to ban Avandia

0 comments

Posted on 30th October 2008 by Gordon Johnson in Uncategorized

, , , , , , ,

Date: 10/30/2008

WASHINGTON (AP) _ The government should ban the diabetes drug Avandia because of a wide variety of life-threatening risks, including heart and liver damage, a consumer group said Thursday.

The consumer group, Public Citizen, filed a petition with the Food and Drug Administration to have Avandia taken off the market.

It was the second setback in as many weeks for the GlaxoSmithKline medication, which at one time had shown great promise in reducing the blood sugar levels of people with Type 2 diabetes. Last week, the American Diabetes Association and a European counterpart jointly released updated treatment guidelines for doctors that pointedly recommended against using Avandia.

“The FDA is in possession of clear, unequivocal evidence that (Avandia) causes a wide variety of toxicities,” Public Citizen said in its petition. “Many of these are life-threatening, such as heart attacks, heart failure (and) liver failure.”

Avandia’s heart risks were brought to light two years ago in a medical journal article that reported a 43 percent higher risk of heart attacks among Avandia patients when compared with those taking other diabetes drugs. Although scientists are still debating a link between the drug and heart attacks, concerns about the medical evidence led to stronger warnings.

As a result, Avandia use dropped sharply but about a million U.S. patients still take it.

Public Citizen said its own research found 14 cases of liver failure associated with Avandia, 12 of which led to death. The petition also said Avandia predisposes some patients to eye problems, anemia and bone fractures.

Glaxo, in a statement, said it does not believe Avandia causes liver failure. The company said its own data shows the drug has a good safety record when it comes to liver problems. The company said the data on heart attacks is inconclusive and that Avandia is safe and effective, when used according to directions.

There was no immediate response from the FDA.

___

On the Net:

Public Citizen Web site: http://www.citizen.org/

Copyright 2008 The Associated Press.

Report: FDA officials opposed drug suit policy

0 comments

Posted on 30th October 2008 by Gordon Johnson in Uncategorized

, , , , , , , , ,

Date: 10/29/2008

By KEVIN FREKING
Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) _ Top scientists and career employees at the Food and Drug Administration opposed agency regulations that weaken consumers’ ability to sue drug makers, congressional investigators said Wednesday.

At issue is language in a drug-labeling rule from 2006 that effectively limits when people can sue in state court over injury claims involving medications. The FDA contends federal regulations prevail when there is a conflict with state law. This concept is called pre-emption.

Internal agency documents showed that career officials opposed this approach, according to a report released by Rep. Henry Waxman, chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. In the past, the agency had viewed private suits as an additional layer of protection against unsafe drugs, the report said.

“Much of the argument for why we are proposing to invoke pre-emption seems to be based on a false assumption that the FDA-approved labeling is fully accurate and up-to-date in a real time basis,” the report quoted Dr. John Jenkins, who oversees FDA’s new drug reviews, as saying. “We know that such an assumption is false.”

Patients injured by drugs have won suits against drug manufacturers for failing to warn against certain dangers.

In a case to be argued before the Supreme Court on Monday, a Vermont woman sued Wyeth after she lost her right arm below the elbow following a high-volume injection of the drug Phenergan. The injection accidentally punctured an artery, prompting gangrene to set in. Levine argued that the company had a duty to warn consumers that such injections could have devastating consequences. The state courts agreed, awarding her nearly $7 million.

Wyeth appealed, saying it was protected from such suits. It argued a state court cannot overrule the FDA’s judgment on label warnings.

FDA scientists had weighed the risks and benefits of Phenergan, used to treat nausea and allergies, when it approved the prescribing literature, or label, as a guide for doctors. The FDA was aware of risks associated with injecting some forms of Phenergan, but the label did not specifically warn about the technique used with Levine.

The FDA said in its 2006 rule and in a 2008 rule that state suits could encourage drug makers to propose unnecessary labeling. Such labeling could result in scientifically unsubstantiated warnings and less use of beneficial treatments.

Waxman’s staff obtained documents rejecting that warning. Jane Axelrad, an associate director for policy at the agency, wrote: “We rarely find ourselves in situations where sponsors want to disclose more risk information than we think is necessary,” she said. “To the contrary, we usually find ourselves dealing with situations where sponsors want to minimize the risk information.”

FDA officials said the agency encourages robust debate on public policy, so some dissension can be expected.

“As in any organization, there is rarely unanimity of opinion,” said spokeswoman Rita Chappelle.

In the end, the agency determined that finalizing the rules were the appropriate action.

“It was appropriate because FDA is the public health agency charged by Congress with the responsibility to ensure that drugs and certain medical devices are safe and effective and that the labeling adequately informs users of the risks and benefits of the product,” Chappelle said. “In addition, the agency is uniquely qualified to make such important and complex judgments.”

Public Citizen, the consumer advocacy group, said the Bush administration had pushed pre-emption clauses in a wide array of regulations.

“This effort to prevent injured citizens from using the courts and holding negligent companies’ accountable must be stopped,” said Brian Wolfman, director of Public Citizen’s litigation group.

The report said the FDA has yet to provide a complete set of documents that would show communications between the White House and the agency, but some documents suggested the agency and the White House would not go forward with a rule on labeling until the pre-emption changes were included.

___

On the Net:

House Oversight and Government Reform Committee: http://oversight.house.gov


Copyright 2008 The Associated Press.

Is BPA safe or no? Gov't leaves consumers confused

0 comments

Posted on 29th October 2008 by Gordon Johnson in Uncategorized

, , , , , , , , ,

Date: 10/29/2008

By RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR
Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) _ BPA — a chemical used in food containers — is so widespread that most people have traces of it in their bodies.

But health officials can’t decide if that’s a problem, or something we all can live with.

Bisphenol A is useful for hardening plastics to make all sorts of consumer products, from CDs to baby bottles. And the canning industry uses it for coatings that prevent leaks and bacterial contamination in metal food containers.

Some scientists are concerned that BPA could be harmful, since it mimics some of the effects of a powerful hormone, estrogen. Infants may be particularly vulnerable because their bodies are developing and cannot eliminate the chemical as quickly.

Earlier this year, the Food and Drug Administration issued a scientific assessment that BPA is safe and asked independent scientists to review its conclusion. That report — made public Tuesday — found that the FDA’s science was badly flawed. The FDA did not consider all the evidence and its margin of safety for human exposure to BPA could be off by a factor of ten times or more, the outside scientists said.

While the experts sort out the issue, what are the options for worried consumers? Here are some questions and answers:

Q: It sounds like BPA is everywhere, how can people avoid it?

A: “Get to know your plastics,” says Urvashi Rangan, a senior scientist with Consumers Union, which publishes Consumer Reports. Avoid polycarbonate plastic containers, those imprinted with the recycling number “7” and the letters “PC.” Don’t microwave foods in these containers. Don’t use polycarbonate plastic baby bottles. Consider powdered infant formula instead of liquid formula in cans. Cut down on canned foods.

“If you the consumer want to take matters into your own hands while the science is being sorted out here, those are the things you can do that will directly reduce your level of exposure to BPA,” said Rangan.

One thing mothers should not do is stop giving their infants proper nutrition because of fears about BPA, says acting Surgeon General Steven Galson. “While the best source of nutrition for babies is the mother’s breast milk, infant formula remains the recommended alternative when breast milk is not an option,” he said.

Q: Wait a minute, aren’t some people overreacting here? Has anybody died from BPA?

A: No direct cause-and-effect relationship has been established to show that exposure to small amounts of BPA harms people.

But many scientific studies have raised that possibility, and some government scientists believe it should not be dismissed lightly. Chemical exposures that cause harm over a long time are hard to detect.

The National Toxicology Program conducted its own BPA assessment earlier this year, and differed with the FDA. The toxicology program found “some concern” for BPA effects on the brain, behavior and prostate gland in fetuses, infants and children at current exposure levels. “Some concern” is right in the middle of the toxicologists’ five-level scale for ranking the possible harmful effects of chemicals.

The independent panel that reviewed the FDA’s assessment said the agency needs to go back and take a second look at several studies it earlier dismissed.

Q: What’s going to happen now?

A: On Friday, the FDA’s Science Board will meet to discuss the controversy in public. It was a subcommittee of the Science Board that issued the report criticizing FDA’s safety analysis. But FDA officials say it could take two to five years to complete additional research and reach a final conclusion.

If scientific evidence against BPA mounts and U.S. regulators don’t act, Congress may try to restrict some uses for the chemical.

“If FDA continues to dismiss independent scientific evaluations of BPA, correcting the issue legislatively is an option,” said Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-Conn., chairwoman of a committee with jurisdiction over the FDA budget.

Q: What would be the downside of just banning BPA altogether?

A: The canning industry thinks there would be unintended consequences. The chemical is used to make epoxy resins that coat and seal the inside of cans. That prevents leaks and keeps bacteria from contaminating the foods inside.

“Although we are looking for alternatives, they are not readily available, and there is no ‘drop-in’ replacement for these uses,” said John Rost, chairman of the North American Metal Packaging Alliance, a trade group. “Quick changes that have not been evaluated could impact the real safety issue: food poisoning.”

Short of a ban on all BPA in food containers, Canada has banned it in baby bottles as a precaution.

___

On the Net:

Scientific advisers report to the FDA: http://tinyurl.com/5mfmm7

Copyright 2008 The Associated Press.

WHO: heart, infectious diseases, cancer kill most

0 comments

Posted on 27th October 2008 by Gordon Johnson in Uncategorized

, , , , , , , ,

Date: 10/27/2008

By ELIANE ENGELER
Associated Press Writer

GENEVA (AP) _ Heart ailments, infectious diseases and cancer remain the world’s top three killers, the U.N. health agency said Monday.

Heart attacks and related problems are the top killer, claiming 29 percent of people who die each year, the World Health Organization said in a report on the global burden of disease. In second place, infectious diseases lead to 16.2 percent of worldwide deaths.

Cancer, in third, claims 12.6 percent of global deaths, said the 146-page report, which is based on death registration data from 112 countries and estimates where reporting is incomplete.

The figures are from 2004, the most recent records available on a wide scale, officials from WHO said. But the rankings are unchanged since 1990 when WHO first did a global check.

Colin Mathers, WHO expert and lead author of the report, said he believed infectious diseases used to be the leading killer 20 to 40 years ago, but that he did not have statistics to back it up.

Some 58.8 million people died worldwide in 2004, most of them over 60, the report said. Nearly one in five deaths was a child under 5.

The heart disease death rate was virtually unchanged from WHO’s previous study on death causes, based on 2002 figures.

The rate for infectious diseases dropped from 2002, when they accounted for 19.1 of the world’s deaths, partly because estimates for AIDS deaths were revised downward last year, said Mathers.

“Malaria deaths are also somewhat lower, and some of the other child causes have also come down a bit,” Mathers said, adding that the number of deaths from measles has dropped thanks to wider use of vaccination.

Women die more often from heart disease than men. The rate for females is 31.5 percent, and for males 26.8 percent, the report said.

Mathers said the percentage for women was higher because there were more women living at older ages than men.

But in general, men are more affected by heart diseases, he said.

“Men in many parts of the world have a higher risk,” he said, adding that they are more often overweight or obese, get insufficient physical activity and eat more fat and salt.

Filling out the top 12 causes of death are respiratory infections including pneumonia in fourth place, 7.2 percent; respiratory diseases, including asthma and allergies, 6.9 percent; accidental injuries and drownings, 6.6 percent; newborn health problems, 5.4 percent; digestive diseases, 3.5 percent; suicide, murder and conflict, 2.8 percent; neuropsychiatric disorders, 2.1 percent; diabetes, 1.9 percent; and maternal health problems related to pregnancy or birth 0.9 percent.

Dr. Ties Boerma, who heads the agency’s statistics department, said there is always a time delay in assembling such data from a number of countries.

“Countries have a backlog of two, three years in publicizing their own information,” he said.

In countries where no death registration data are available, the figures are taken from research studies, which take a few years to get published, Boerma said.

___

On the Net:

http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/2004_report_update/en/index.html

Copyright 2008 The Associated Press.

Heart device maker recalls implant

0 comments

Posted on 26th October 2008 by Gordon Johnson in Uncategorized

, , , , , , ,

Date: 10/26/2008

PLEASANTON, Calif. (AP) _ A medical device company has ordered the recall of certain batches of a small mechanical heart pump, saying five people have died while using the device.

Thoratec Corp. urged patients to have their implants checked after confirming 27 reports of cases in which wear and fatigue to an electrical wire required the devices to be replaced, the company said in a statement Friday.

The reports occurred over five years of clinical experience with 1,972 implants, the company said. In five cases, the device could not be replaced and the patients died.

The recall affects devices with catalog numbers 1355 and 102139, which have been distributed to 153 hospitals and distributors throughout the United States and other countries since the beginning of clinical studies in November 2003.

A Thoratec spokeswoman did not immediately respond to a call seeking additional comment Sunday.

The HeartMate II pump was approved in April as a temporary treatment for patients awaiting heart transplants, but analysts had said the larger market for the product is in “destination therapy,” or patients with end-stage heart failure who are too ill for a transplant.


Copyright 2008 The Associated Press.


Nev. agency links 114 hepatitis cases to 2 clinics

0 comments

Posted on 24th October 2008 by Gordon Johnson in Uncategorized

, , , , , , , ,

Date: 10/23/2008 6:40 PM

By KEN RITTER
Associated Press Writer

LAS VEGAS (AP) _ Investigators think they’ve identified almost everyone who may have contracted the potentially deadly hepatitis C virus at two Las Vegas outpatient medical clinics, a top public health official said Thursday.

“In putting everything together, we’ve identified 114 cases in total linked to the two clinics,” said Brian Labus, the Southern Nevada Health District’s senior epidemiologist.

“We still have some analysis to do,” Labus said of the tally, which was up from 86 in July, “but we don’t expect the numbers to change much.”

District officials say nine cases of the incurable blood-borne liver disease are the result of the unsafe practice of reusing syringes and medicine vials at the Endoscopy Center of Southern Nevada and the Desert Shadow Endoscopy Center. Both clinics have since been closed.

The other 105 people were diagnosed with the disease since becoming patients at the clinics, but could have contracted the disease in other ways, Labus said.

Health officials say those diagnosed with the disease are receiving treatment. Hepatitis C can cause swelling of the liver, stomach pain, fatigue and jaundice. Even when no symptoms occur, the virus can slowly damage the liver.

While the health district has not attributed any deaths to the outbreak, the widow of one of the clinic’s former patients has filed a lawsuit blaming her 60-year-old husband’s hepatitis C diagnosis and death in 2006 on unsafe medical practices.

Labus said some 50,000 former Endoscopy Center of Southern Nevada patients and 13,000 former Desert Shadow Endoscopy Center patients have been notified to get tested for hepatitis B, C and HIV, the virus that causes AIDS. No cases of hepatitis B or HIV have been linked to the outbreak.

So far, 7,331 people have provided the agency with medical information to help with the investigation, Labus said. He said he hopes to have a final report ready for district administrators by the anniversary of the date the outbreak was detected, Jan. 2.

Both clinics were affiliated with Dr. Dipak Desai, a prominent Nevada gastroenterologist who headed several endoscopy clinics in the Las Vegas area. Desai surrendered his license to practice medicine pending the results of health district and police investigations.

Desai and other former clinic owners face more than 120 lawsuits alleging medical negligence and a class-action by patients who weren’t made ill but claim emotional distress.

___

On the Net:

Southern Nevada Health District: http://www.southernnevadahealthdistrict.org/

Copyright 2008 The Associated Press.

Pfizer completes part of painkiller settlement

0 comments

Posted on 23rd October 2008 by Gordon Johnson in Uncategorized

, , , , , , , ,

Date: 10/22/2008

NEW YORK (AP) _ Pfizer Inc. said Wednesday it finalized part of a larger, $894 million deal to settle lawsuits over its promotion of the painkillers Celebrex and discontinued Bextra.

The company made official a deal that would pay $60 million to settle investigations by 33 states and Washington, D.C., over Bextra, while also agreeing to adopt compliance measures. Various states alleged Pfizer promoted the painkiller for “off-label” uses, or uses it was not approved for. While a physician is allowed to prescribe drugs for off-label uses, a company cannot market them for unapproved uses.

States also alleged the company misrepresented the safety of the drug.

As part of the settlement, Pfizer denied that its promotional practices violated any laws.

Among other strictures, the settlement requires Pfizer to submit all consumer television advertisements to the FDA for approval, the New Jersey attorney general’s office said. Pfizer said such practice was already company policy.

Last week, the company said it would pay $745 million to settle personal injury cases, $60 million to cover settlements with attorneys general in the 33 states and Washington, D.C., and $89 million to cover consumer fraud class action cases over reimbursement for money spent on the two drugs.

In all, the company said the settlements would cover more than 90 percent of the pending legal actions.

“As we announced last week, these settlements avoid the disruption and expense of litigation and put these matters behind us,” Amy W. Schulman, senior vice president and general counsel of Pfizer, said in a statement.

Celebrex and Bextra came under scrutiny following lawsuits over a similar drug made by Merck & Co., called Vioxx. Merck has begun paying a $4.85 billion settlement to end about 50,000 lawsuits brought by people claiming the drug caused heart attacks, ischemic strokes or death.

Bextra, like Vioxx, was a Cox-2 inhibitor.

“This medicine (Bextra) was rigorously studied and tested by the company and independent medical experts, and information about its benefits and risks was fully disclosed to the FDA,” Schulman said.

Celebrex is currently the only Cox-2 inhibitor on the market.

Pfizer has also agreed to other compliance measures regarding its promotional programs. The New Jersey Attorney General’s office, in a statement, said the settlement places strictures on such practices as companies “ghost writing” drug-related articles and studies, deceptively using scientific data when marketing to doctors, and awarding incentives to sales staff to increase off-label prescribing by doctors.

“This case should send a strong message to the industry at large that New Jersey does not tolerate deception and misleading claims in the promotion of prescription drugs,” Attorney General Anne Milgram said in a statement.

Copyright 2008 The Associated Press.